Business User Guide
Welcome to the Ergodic Insurance Optimization Business User Guide. This guide will help you use our advanced simulation framework to make data-driven decisions about insurance retentions and limit selections for your company.
This guide is designed for:
CFOs and Financial Decision Makers who need to optimize insurance spending
Risk Managers evaluating insurance program structures
Entry-level Actuaries learning practical insurance optimization
Business Owners seeking to balance growth and risk protection
No advanced mathematics or programming knowledge is required. We’ll walk you through everything step-by-step using practical examples and clear explanations.
Guide Contents:
- Executive Summary
- Quick Start Guide
- Prerequisites
- Step 1: Understanding Your Company Profile
- Step 2: Defining Your Risk Profile
- Step 3: Exploring Insurance Structures
- Step 4: Running Your First Simulation
- Step 5: Using Pre-Built Notebooks
- Step 6: Interpreting Initial Results
- Quick Decision Rules
- Next Steps
- Common Issues
- Ready for More?
- Running Your Analysis
- Decision Framework
- Model Cases
- Advanced Topics
- Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) Solver User Guide
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Glossary
Getting Started
If you’re new to ergodic insurance optimization, we recommend reading the sections in order:
Start with the Executive Summary to understand the core concepts
Follow the Quick Start Guide to set up your first analysis
Use Running Your Analysis to perform your own company assessment
Apply the Decision Framework to make optimal choices
Review Model Cases for realistic examples
For Help
Check the Frequently Asked Questions for common questions
Consult the Glossary for term definitions
Review example notebooks in
ergodic_insurance/notebooks/
Open an issue on GitHub
Contact: Alex Filiakov (alexfiliakov@gmail.com)
Key Insight
The Insurance Paradox: Traditional insurance analysis uses ensemble averages (expected values across many companies). But your company experiences time averages (growth over years). These can differ dramatically. Our framework shows that paying 200-500% of expected losses can be optimal when viewed through the lens of time-average growth.
Ready to transform insurance from a cost center to a growth enabler? Let’s begin!